بررسی ارتباط بين سن کودکان و افشاء سوءاستفاده جنسي در مصاحبه هاي پزشکی قانوني

•   آرشیو : نسخه تابستان 1399 - جلد اول
•   کد پذیرش : 11589
•   موضوع : سایر شاخه های روانشناسی
• نویسنده/گان : سپیده شهیدی
•   کلید واژه : سوءاستفاده جنسي از کودکان، ويژگي هاي پرونده، افشاگري، مصاحبه پزشکی قانوني، سن کودک.
•   Title : The Relationship Between Children’s Age and Disclosures of Sexual Abuse During Forensic Interviews
•   Abstract :
  Children’s disclosures of sexual abuse during forensic interviews are fundamental to the investigation of cases. Research Examining the relationship between age and disclosure has shown mixed results; the aim of the current study was to clarify and extend our knowledge by modeling linear, quadratic, and interaction effects of age on disclosure. Child sexual abuse reports made by children, their caregivers, or mandated reporters over a 12-month period to police in one state of Australia were examined. Of the 527 children (age range 3–16 years) offered a forensic interview, 81% disclosed abuse during it. The other 19% did not disclose or refused the interview. Age had both linear and quadratic effects, whereby disclosure increased with age until 11 years, after which disclosure decreased with age to 16 years. The effect of age on disclosure was moderated by five variables: abuse severity, the child–suspect relationship, suspects’ violence histories, delay of report to police, and children’s previous disclosures. Particular groups of children had lower likelihoods of disclosing abuse in forensic interviews than others, such as adolescents who alleged abuse against suspects with histories of violent offending. By identifying these groups, targeted strategies may be developed to help increase their disclosure rates.
•   key words :
  Child sexual abuse, case characteristics, disclosure, forensic interview, child age
•   مراجع :
  [1] Arata, C. M. (1998). To tell or not to tell: Current functioning of child sexual abuse survivors who disclosed their victimization. Child Maltreatment, 3, 63–71. doi:10.1177/1077559598003001006
  [2] Bunting, L. (2008). Sexual offences against children: An exploration of attrition in the Northern Ireland criminal justice system. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32, 1109–1118. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09. 002
  [3] Campis, L. B., Hebden-Curtis, J., & DeMaso, D. R. (1993). Develop- mental differences in detection and disclosure of sexual abuse. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychia- try, 32, 920–924. doi:10.1097/00004583-199309000-00005
  [4] Cederborg, A., Lamb, M., & Laurell, O. (2007). Delay of disclosure, minimization, and denial of abuse when the evidence is unambig- uous: A multivictim case. In M. L. M. Pipe, Y. Orbach, & A. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay and denial (pp. 159–173). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  [5] DiPietro, E., Runyan, D., & Fredrickson, D. (1997). Predictors of disclosure during medical evaluation for suspected sexual abuse. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 6, 133–142. doi:10.1300/ J070v06n01_07
  [6] Farrell, L. T. (1988). Factors that affect a victim’s self-disclosure in father–daughter incest. Child Welfare, 67, 462–468.
  [7] Fitzgerald, J. (2006). The attrition of sexual offences from the New South Wales criminal justice system. Contemporary issues in crim- inal justice (Vol. 92). Sydney, Australia: Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research.
  [8] Fontanella, C., Harrington, D., & Zuravin, S. J. (2000). Gender dif-
  [9] ferences in the characteristics and outcomes of sexually abused preschoolers. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse: Research, Treatment, & Program Innovations for Victims, Survivors, & Offenders, 9, 21–40. Doi:10.1300/J070v09n02_02
  [10] Ganzach, Y. (1997). Misleading interaction and curvilinear terms.
  [11] Psychological Methods, 2, 235–247. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.2.3. 235
  [12] Goodman-Brown, T. B., Edelstein, R. S., Goodman, G. S., Jones, D. P., & Gordon, D. S. (2003). Why children tell: A model of children’s disclosure of sexual abuse. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 525–540. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(03)00037-1
  [13] Gries, L., Goh, D., & Cavanaugh, J. (1996). Factors associated with disclosure during child sexual abuse assessment. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 5, 1–19. doi:10.1300/J070v05n03_01
  [14] Hershkowitz, I., Horowitz, D., & Lamb, M. (2005). Trends in chil- dren’s disclosure of abuse in Israel: A national study. Child Abuse and Neglect, 29, 1203–1214. doi:10.1300/J070v05n03_01
  [15] Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M. E., & Katz, C. (2014). Allegation rates in forensic child abuse investigations: Comparing the revised and standard NICHD protocols. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 336–344. doi:10.1037/a0037391
  [16] Keary, K., & Fitzpatrick, C. (1994). Children’s disclosure of sexual abuse during formal investigation. Child Abuse & Neglect, 18, 543–548. doi:10.1016/0145-2134(94)90080-9
  [17] Kogan, S. (2004). Disclosing unwanted sexual experiences: Results from a national sample of adolescent women. Child Abuse & Neglect, 28, 147–165. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.09.014
  [18] Lamb, S., & Edgar-Smith, S. (1994). Aspects of disclosure mediators of outcome of childhood sexual abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 9, 307–326. doi:10.1177/088626094009003002
  [19] Lamb, M. E., Orbach, Y., Hershkowitz, I., Esplin, P. W., & Horowitz,
  [20] D. (2007). A structured forensic interview protocol improves the quality and informativeness of investigative interviews with children: A review of research using the NICHD Investigative Interview Protocol. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 1201–1231. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.03.021
  [21] Leclerc, B., & Wortley, R. (2015). Predictors of victim disclosure in child sexual abuse: Additional evidence from a sample of incar- cerated adult sex offenders. Child Abuse & Neglect, 43, 104–111. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.003
  [22] Lievore, D. (2005). No longer silent: A study of women’s help-seeking decisions and service responses to sexual assault. Canberra: Aus- tralian Institute of Criminology.
  [23] Lippert, T., Cross, T., Jones, L., & Walsh, W. (2009). Telling inter- viewers about sexual abuse: Predictors of child disclosure at for- ensic interview. Child Maltreatment, 14, 100–113. doi:10.1177/ 088626094009003002
  [24] London, K., Bruck, M., Ceci, S. J., & Shuman, D. W. (2007). Disclo- sure of child sexual abuse: A review of the contemporary empirical literature. In M.-E. Pipe, M. E. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A.-C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay and denial (pp. 11–39). New York, NY: Routledge.
  [25] Lyon, T. D. (2007). False denials: Overcoming methodological biases in abuse disclosure research. In M.-E. Pipe, M. E. Lamb,
  [26] Y. Orbach, & A.-C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclosure, delay and denial (pp. 41–62). New York, NY: Routledge.
  [27] Malloy, L. C., Brubacher, A. P., & Lamb, M. (2011). Expected con- sequences of disclosure revealed in investigative interviews with suspected victims of child sexual abuse. Applied Developmental Science, 15, 8–19. doi:10.1080/10888691.2011.538616
  [28] Pipe, M., Lamb, M., Orbach, Y., Sternberg, K., Stewart, H., & Esplin,
  [29] P. (2007). Factors associated with nondisclosure of suspected abuse during forensic interviews. In M.-E. Pipe, M. E. Lamb, Y. Orbach, & A.-C. Cederborg (Eds.), Child sexual abuse: Disclo- sure, delay and denial (pp. 77–96). New York, NY: Routledge.
  [30] Powell, M. B. (2008). Designing effective training programs for inves- tigative interviewers of children. Current Issues in Criminal Jus- tice, 20, 189–208.
  [31] Rush, E. B., Lyon, T. D., Ahern, E. C., & Quas, J. A. (2014). Disclo- sure suspicion bias and abuse disclosure comparisons between sexual and physical abuse. Child Maltreatment, 19, 113–118. doi:10.1177/1077559514538114
  [32] Tang, C. S. (2002). Childhood experience of sexual abuse among Hong Kong Chinese college students. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26, 23–37. doi:10.1016/S0145-2134(01)00306-4
  [33] Teoh, Y. S., & Lamb, M. (2013). Interviewer demeanor in forensic interviews of children. Psychology, Crime & Law, 19, 145–159. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2011.614610
•  صفحات : 69-83
•   دانلود فایل ( 952.10 KB )